Monkey Business
The NIH and Wuhan have launched their second bio-weapon in under four years. Here's everything you need to know about monkeypox.
By this point, most of us recognize that Covid-19 emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. While hard evidence has not been made public (and never will be) everything we do know points to this as the most probable origin by an overwhelming margin. How so?
If you already know the reasons, you can skip down to the “ENTER: MONKEYPOX” section. But if you doubt the lab leak hypothesis or just want to understand it better, here’s a recap.
THE CASE FOR LAB LEAK
Viruses do not spontaneously develop the ability to transfer from animals to humans or from humans to other humans overnight. Both are massive evolutionary leaps that result from an evolutionary process that should be readily evidenced. Yet it hasn’t been. Same goes for the jump to airborne transmission.
Yet there remains no evidence that Covid-19 was pervasive among any animal species prior to infecting humans. There is no evidence that the virus was ever not wildly transmissible between humans or not airborne. Yet if you believe the mainstream narrative, this virus was so special that Covid-19 was born with all three tricks right off the bat. No pun intended.
That’s like being born and already knowing how to walk, talk, chew gum, and jump rope at the same time straight out of the womb. Does that sound natural to you? Of course not. That’s because there is nothing natural about the birth of Covid-19.
SARS-COV1
Recall that the SARS-CoV1 epidemic resulted in only 8,439 total cases worldwide (73 in the United States) with 812 deaths, with a case fatality rate of 9.6%. This virus spread through droplets produced by coughing, sneezing, talking, or breathing.
We know that the National Institute of Health (with the approval of Dr. Anthony Fauci) funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology through an intermediary, EcoHealth Alliance, to perform gain-of-function research on SARS-CoV1. This isn’t seriously disputed by anyone, yet the brought to you by Pfizer media outlets certainly avoids reporting on it. The NIH openly admitted this research was taking place while Dr. Fauci continued to deny it under oath.
Fauci’s leaked emails, which remain suspiciously littered with redactions, still reveal enough to show an effort to cover-up the lab leak, with 267 mentions of the word “Wuhan”.
Notable emails include a message from Kristian G. Anderson (page 3187), an evolutionary biologist, who noted unusual features of the virus as early as January 2020, going on to say that one has to look really closely to all sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered”. He went on to say that he and his colleagues “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”.
Anderson went on to write a paper in March 2020 that argued the exact opposite, concluding that COVID was not made in a laboratory, even denying gain-of-function research entirely!
Anderson was questioned about this contradiction by Newsweek a year later after he dismissed his own suspicions that the virus had been engineered, calling his previous findings based entirely on speculation with no credible evidence. He was lying, since his private emails to Fauci explicitly cited analysis of Covid’s genome sequence that had been performed by himself and his colleagues.
Another email came from NIH Director Francis Collins (Fauci’s boss) on April 16, 2020 (page 1311), raising concerns over the lab leak conspiracy gaining momentum, citing this Mediaite article.
Collins of course would want the lab leak idea shut down due to his position and liability. He joined a secret teleconference, confirmed to have taken place by Fauci himself, in response to Anderson’s email. Discussion over the NIH funding of gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan lab took place. The full details and scope of that meeting were heavily redacted and remain unavailable to the public, but limited transcripts were obtained by House Republicans.
Mike Furzan, an evolutionary biologist on the call, said he was bothered by the furin site and had a hard time explain[ing] that as an event outside the lab which he described as being highly unlikely. (page 5)
Another individual on that call was Robert Garry who said:
“I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function – that and you don’t change any other amino acid in S2? I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature.” (page 5-6)
Garry, like Anderson, also made a sudden and complete reversal, later arguing in favor of Covid-19 having a natural origin.
And a third email from the Fauci files on April 18, 2020 (page 1150) from Peter Daszak, Director of EcoHealth Alliance (the intermediary for the funding between NIH and the Wuhan Lab) thanking Fauci for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Incredibly, Daszak of all people was chosen to be the sole U.S. member on the World Health Organization’s international to investigate the Wuhan lab. They waited until over a year into the pandemic, giving the Chinese government ample time to wipe any incriminating records. WHO didn’t even ask to review the deleted databases.
During an interview with 60 Minutes, Daszak clumsily admitted that the investigation amounted to asking the Chinese authorities questions and simply taking their word for it. Here’s the key segment from the transcript:
WHY BOTHER?
The justification for this gain-of-function research, or so we’ve been told, is that by enhancing known pathogens we can better prepare against future iterations of a disease before it naturally occurs.
There are scenarios in which this might be arguably practical, but SARS-CoV1 had been very short-lived and burnt out years ago. There was no reason to expect a natural resurgence down the line, let alone a pandemic-level threat, and therefore no reason to prepare for such a non-eventuality.
Which is why gain-of-function research, at least in this case, couldn’t possibly have been about defending against a potential threat. And if it’s not about defense, it’s about offense. The only alternative purpose would be for shits and giggles, which I refuse to entertain. All signs suggest this research was used to intentionally develop a bioweapon. That much should be exceedingly clear.
The question we should be asking is for what purpose?
Perhaps to create an “…urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that’s completely disruptive, that’s not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes” as described by Rick Bright, Director of BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research & Development Authority) in October 2019. BARDA just so happened to manage the financials for Operation Warp Speed.
Translation: Let’s create a pandemic as a catalyst to fast-track mRNA vaccines.
Remember, the primary goal of any virus is to survive. There is no evolutionary incentive to kill infected hosts since that makes spreading to other hosts a very finite endeavor. For that reason viruses tend to reach their deadliest peak early on, then evolve to become less deadly and more transmissible. It wants us alive, sneezing and coughing, enabling further viral replication. The more cases there are the more opportunity the virus has to mutate and the longer it can cement circulation among the population.
So suddenly SARS-CoV2 emerges from the Wuhan lab, causing near-identical symptoms to SARS-CoV1 but with a significantly lower fatality rate and a significantly higher infectivity rate. This is exactly what we would expect to result from gain-of-function experiments on SARS-CoV1.
In short, SARS-CoV2 is an artificial approximation of a future version of SARS-CoV1 if the spread of SARS-CoV1 had not been successfully contained and had continued on it’s natural, evolutionary trajectory.
Even without any of the above information, the correlation between CoV1 and CoV2 just by name alone was immediately apparent yet the transition between the two in terms of both virulence and transmissibility was mysteriously absent. There is no evidenced natural progression. Why the gap? This alone should have sparked basic questions, such as how did CoV1 become CoV2?
The answer at the end of that rabbit hole would invariably lead to gain-of-function research, of course, which is why such questions were scarcely being asked, the name for the virus shifted to Covid-19, and any mention of the lab leak hypothesis was treated as a fringe conspiracy theory by Big Pharma-sponsored politicians and media outlets, while Big Tech simultaneously censored social media accounts that even referenced the issue of a lab leak. And that’s despite even President Trump acknowledging it as early as April 2020.
The corporate media, always acting as blind contrarians against Trump, reported there was no evidence to support a lab leak:
Nearly an entire year later, the former CDC Director Robert Redfield grew a pair and admitted he believed Covid-19 emerged from the Wuhan lab in China. And subsequently received death threats from other scientists because of it, even after generously adding that he thought the lab leak was an accident.
ENTER: MONKEYPOX
There are enough dots connecting NIH, EcoAlliance, and the Wuhan lab to draw a straight line and conclude that a lab leak caused the Covid-19 pandemic as a result of gain-of-function research funded by the United States.
What is truly stunning is that the NIH went on to give another $10 million to the very same lab to conduct research on monkeypox. For what purpose? To artificially create and “efficiently assemble” the virus genome of monkeypox.
We’re supposed to believe that there’s no connection here? Exactly how stupid do the powers-that-be think we are? Very, apparently. And they’re probably not wrong because hardly anyone is even talking about the reason for this oddly abrupt iteration of monkeypox. Because unlike Covid, monkeypox has been with us for awhile.
It was first discovered in 1958 among (SPOILER ALERT) monkey populations with the first human cases not being known until 1970. Half a century later, no major outbreaks. Until now. Like the transition from SARS1 to SARS2, the evolutionary steps between the two are suspiciously absent. Once again we jumped from A to C and didn’t bother to ask about B. Why?
WHAT CHANGED?
A document titled Nuclear Threat Initiative from March 2021 explored a hypothetical scenario (wink-wink) in which a monkeypox outbreak occurs without international warning after being engineered in a lab to be vaccine-resistant. Y’know, just a random hypothetical. Any foreshadowing of a very near-future reality was just a coincidence, of course. That’s what we’re expected to believe.
Here’s the relevant excerpt, which you can read for yourself on page 8:
In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) partnered with the Munich Security Conference (MSC) to conduct a tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats. Conducted virtually, the exercise examined gaps in national and international biosecurity and pandemic preparedness architectures and explored opportunities to improve capabilities to prevent and respond to high-consequence biological events. Participants included 19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.
The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.
Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.
Page 23 even maps out a timeline for a monkeypox outbreak, with the first case of the lab-created strain appearing on May 15, 2022. The first case of the current outbreak was reported in the UK on May 7, 2022.
What a remarkably accurate prediction!
Plenty of sheep would have believed the so-called fact checkers if they’d dismissed the March 2021 NTI report entirely, claimed it was “disinformation” produced by a blogger linked to the Kremlin. (1) Deny reality (2) blame Russia then (3) dismiss the truth-tellers as fringe conspiracy nuts. That’s been the Establishment playbook that’s been rinsed and repeated. As stupid and lazy as that strategy may be, it’s proven to be a wildly successful formula.
Just consider how many Americans bought into the ridiculously absurd Russiagate hoax and still believe it.
Which is precisely why the Establishment discourages the public from doing their homework. Because we might just learn something that would be inconvenient to the fictional narratives they want us to believe.
Yet interestingly even the fact-checkers at Reuters confirmed the validity of the simulated monkeypox outbreak report… but insisted it was a coincidence. Note that Reuters doesn’t explicitly say that this new iteration of monkeypox wasn’t accidentally released from the Wuhan lab, just that it wasn’t planned.
Jaime Yassif, vice president of Global Biological Policy and Programs at NTI, told Reuters via email that NTI designed a fictional scenario to discuss “urgently needed improvements in global capabilities to prevent and respond to pandemics” and selected monkeypox from the options offered by expert advisers as it was a plausible fit for this scenario.
“The fact that several countries are currently experiencing an outbreak of monkeypox is purely a coincidence,” Yassif said. “The key takeaway from our exercise is not the specific pathogen in our fictional scenario; it’s the fact that the world is woefully unprepared to guard against future pandemics, and we need to take urgent action to address this vulnerability.”
They simulated a monkeypox outbreak because… no other virus could have been a plausible fit…? Really?
Why not bird flu, which virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka warned about in 2006? “We are watching this virus turn itself into a human pathogen,” he said. As the article points out in the final paragraph, “The last two flu pandemics in 1957 and 1968 were caused by avian viruses.”
Considering history you’d think an avian flu pandemic being the most likely pandemic scenario, would be the most ideal to simulate and prepare for. But okay, let’s spend nearly $10 million of taxpayer money running experiments on monkeypox in an insecure lab despite just a few hundred cases sporadically cropping up since 1970, the majority being confined to 11 African countries (the worst being 200+ confirmed cases in Nigeria in 2017).
Compare that to the now 64,000+ cases spread across 94 countries in just a few short months, 87 of which have not historically reported any cases of monkeypox. At least, that’s according to the latest data posted by the World Health Organization, which you can review here.
But if you think any monkey business is going behind the scenes then you must be an anti-vaxxer conspiracy-theorizing white supremacist who hates science and, according to the new Department of Homeland Security guidelines, that makes you a domestic terrorist according to the Biden regime. Because how dare you have any ideas that contradict corrupt government narratives. Just believe exactly what you’re told by corrupt politicians and media outlets that have blatant conflicts of interest and blindly bow before the almighty fact-checkers. It’s not like the Poynter Institute is funded by the Charles Koch Foundation, Google News Initiative (CIA), Meta (Facebook), Microsoft (Bill Gates), etc… right? Mhm.
So for those keeping score there have been three public health emergencies involving viruses declared in the United States in under three years. Covid-19 (lab leak), monkeypox (lab leak) and (vaccine-induced) polio in New York.
Expect a fourth manufactured health crisis within the next 6-12 months to continue justifying ongoing emergency powers to further the totalitarian aspirations of the WEF globalists, enabling the depopulation agenda to continue.