The United Nations is endorsing the decriminalization of pedophilia under the condition of consensual participation by the child. In other words, the UN is advocating for the removal of the age of consent. The "8 March Principles" proposal, formulated by the unelected International Commission of Jurists, is composed of individuals who, it appears, harbor perverse inclinations and sympathize with pedophilia.
Here's the exact text:
“Moreover, sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of person under 18 years of age to make decisions about engaging in sexual conduct.”
If you don’t believe it, read it yourself. Specifically PDF pages 26-27. And if you’re wondering how we know that the UN is backing this insanity, they not only inspired this panel of jurists in the first place…
”In 2018, the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the International Commission of Jurists – inspired by recent international initiatives, such as the 2017 Joint UN Statement on Ending Discrimination in Health Care Settings – convened an expert meeting to discuss the role of jurists in addressing the harmful human rights impact of criminal laws”
…but several high-ranking UN employees were also among “the first to endorse the Principles”.
The United Nations should have taken decisive action to expel those members who lent their support to the legalization of pedophilia. Surprisingly (or perhaps not given the media blackout on this issue), no public outcry ensued, and all these proponents have managed to retain their positions without consequence.
But wait, there’s more!
This repugnant document further proposes global safeguards for all practitioners engaged in the provision of "gender-affirming care" for minors (chemical castration via hormone blockers and/or physical butchery via surgical intervention). Because we wouldn’t want to prosecute child abusers or any of their enablers, would we?
We are unable to drive until we turn 16, unable to vote until 18, unable to drink until 21, and unable to rent a car until 25. Why? Because we, as a society, have long understood that our still-developing minds and bodies are susceptible to poor judgment and legal safeguards are required. But children should now be permitted to undergo sex-change operations if they desire to do so, solely based on their feelings…?
The corporate media certainly seems to think so, as do the majority of Democrats, the United Nations, and the World Economic Forum, who all echo the very small but very loud fringe of delusional freaks who populate the woke-cult.
Biden himself even went so far as to denounce opposition to child transitioning as being sinful.
To be fair, Joe is Catholic, so passivity to child abuse is deeply engrained. Plus it appears he molested his own daughter, Ashley Biden, according to… Ashley Biden.
It’s amazing how child abuse is being presented as something innocuous, even as virtuous, through the deceptive alteration of language. And the excuses for it always fall back on the guise of being sensitive to marginalized groups and respecting individual choice. Hell, they’re even trying to get rid of the word pedophile entirely and replacing it with minor-attracted person (MAP) to be “less offensive”.
This is the weaponization of soft language George Carlin warned about:
Here’s a perfect example of this manipulative abuse of language from the same document (page 7):
Moreover, substantive and procedural criminal law may, whether or not by design, effectively incorporate elements of discrimination embedded in perceived gender roles and patriarchal, heteronormative power relations between women and men and in other historical distinctions founded upon prohibited discrimination grounds.
I do agree that pedophile is an offensive term… but only because the proper term should be child-fucker since that would be a far more apt descriptor. It also makes it a helluva lot easier for us to purge society of these nauseating predators and sleep well at night knowing our children are safer for it. The last thing we should be worried about is offending such monsters.
If thats too radical for you, fine. How about the child-fuckers get to stick around if and only if they consent to being disarmed via castration? Fair enough? You would think so, especially since chemically and/or physically castrating children is explicitly being normalized. But if there truly existed a moral consensus, the dissolution of Vatican City with immediate seizure of its assets, as well as the conversion of every Catholic church into a homeless shelter would have been implemented decades ago.
Ah, but doing so would be far too Christ-like. And there’s no chance of that happening in the godless, totalitarian West, is there?